Picking Darcy’s Pocket – Money, money, money

In May 1812, Mr Fitzwilliam Darcy is walking down a London street. As has been his practice of late, he had been turning over the words of Elizabeth Bennet in his mind. ‘Had you acted in a more gentlemanlike manner’. Distracted, he doesn’t notice a shabby young man in a long coat brush past him. Israel Fagin, at the beginning of his long and disreputable career (which was to lead to literary fame and the condemned cell at Newgate), had taken something from his pocket – but what?

Of course, the one thing that a pickpocket wanted to get every time was money. You could spend it straight away, it didn’t need to be sold to a fence – though in the early nineteenth century that wasn’t always true.

Though before I talk about the actual money that might have been in the pocket of a Regency gentleman, I want to consider how it might have been carried. Very low denomination coins, pennies, half pennies and farthings might have been carried loose, as they were relatively large (as I will discuss later some were very large), but as there were a number of high value, small size coins, purses were common. Banknotes were carried in pocket books, these looked exactly like modern wallets. Indeed some even have spaces that look as if they could take credit cards! – thought these were for visiting cards.

Purses were another matter, they were very varied and gentlemen, as well as women, might carry brightly coloured ones.

Featured image

Miser’s or ring purses are long, sausage shaped, purses with a slit in the middle where the coins could be inserted, then slid to one end and held in place with a moveable ring. The practice seems to have been for one end to hold lower value coins, and the other higher value. They were common from the late eighteenth to late nineteenth centuries. They were called miser’s purses because of the difficulty removing money, it takes time to get the coins out so the user seems to be reluctant to hand over their coins.

Featured imageNetted purses, this type of purse is just the sort of thing that might have been made by a lady and given to friend or relation (I can imagine Georgiana Darcy making one of these under the tutelage of her governess, the replacement for the disreputable Mrs Younge, and giving it to her brother). Netting was a very popular handicraft at that period, so much so that it led to a revolution in fashion that reverberates today. Up until the late eighteenth century women had pockets under their skirts, which were tied to a band round their waist and accessed through a slit in the skirt or petticoat. Then fashion changed, the Empire Line came in with a straight, close fitting, dresses with nowhere to hang a pocket without spoiling the line of the garment.

However ladies no took to carrying their netting equipment in small bags, which the French thought silly and called them Ridicules, in England they were welcomed and as they carried netting tools were named for the craft Reticules – from the Latin Reticulum, netting. These bags have been carried by women ever since, as the craft disappeared they were renames simply hand bags, though in America for some reason they were thought to look like purses, and that name had stuck to them.

The clasp, of gilded brass, would have been bought from a haberdasher. It was almost certainly made in Birmingham – where absolutely everything was made at this time.

Featured image

This simple leather purse is very small and plain, it has two compartments and will only hold a few coins. However in the past century it has had another, much more unusual and romantic role, holding wedding rings. At my parents wedding, at my and my brothers weddings and at my son’s wedding, the best man kept the wedding rings safe in this purse. I hope to keep up this tradition if and when my other son and nephew and nieces get married.

I am currently working on a project called Picking Darcy’s Pocket, where I will be using objects that might have been found in the pocket of a Regency gentleman, to discuss various aspects of the period. In due course I will be doing this as a lecture/ performance, but for now I am just collecting the objects real or facsimile

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under Historical Reconstructions, Picking Darcy's Pocket, Regency

6 responses to “Picking Darcy’s Pocket – Money, money, money

  1. I really enjoyed this post again you make it so interesting. The net bag can still be found in the for of the string bag I assume. Trust the French to ridicule us! and the Americans to call the handbag a purse ( I have never understood that but hey two nations divided by one language. )
    I love the wedding tradition of keeping the rings in that purse, long may it continue. xx

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Autism Mom

    Such a lovely tradition with that simple purse – I hope it is carried on for many generations.

    Like

  3. I just learned so much. Thank you for all this information!

    Like

  4. Pingback: Separated by a common language – A Victorian Theme Park or the death of the Sidewalk | The Curious Archaeologist

  5. This is so cool! And I love the tradition your family has for carrying wedding rings in this coin purse.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s